The most obvious indicator of the state of society is the state of the arts. It should be obvious, but society just doesn't get it. The state of society as measured by the state of the arts is in serious trouble. The state of the arts makes a mockery of art, so therefore our society makes a mockery of itself.
The only possible justification for this is to view society as just one big work of art — an improvisational theatre of the absurd. That's the only way to find any merit in it. The tragic problem is that it's curtains for humanity.
The predicament with the arts can be simply summed up as follows:
1. The average dictionary defines art as the expression or application of human creative skill and imagination producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power. The value of such beauty is measured by the aesthetic principals, not personal taste.
2. Great artists command respect, and great art sells for millions of dollars. Since both are scarce the industry needed a way to generate revenue. So they changed the definition of art, and add new genres whenever sales of the old fad slow down.
3. To maximize profits marketers for the arts tricked society into thinking that almost anything can be art, and almost anyone can be an artist. So that explains why so much kitsch exists in the art market. Any no-talent bum can take something from a trash bin and call it art.
Artistic standards spiraled downward with the advent of personal computers. While increasing the efficiency of production artists the overall affect on art in general was a disaster. The negative impact was so severe that the only way to overcome the damage would be to ban the use of computers entirely, which may not be feasible because clandestine use by criminals in hiding might still be possible. Meanwhile the scourge of these menacing machines continues to take a toll on society. It all started with the commercial release of consumer-level graphic design programs. When amateurs got their hands on these professional software applications it was like a rouge state acquiring nuclear warheads. They launched an aesthetic holocaust of biblical proportions, the aftermath of which we are still living with today. Thousands of professional artists were instantly vaporized by the initial blast of pseudo art produced by these tinhorn design dictators, and then the radioactive faux-aesthetic fallout contaminated the entire publishing industry. As soon as print publishers realized that they could get any staff member or even the janitor to make graphics using powerful new software tools, they discontinued hiring professional designers. It made no difference whether the artistic quality was good or bad; the only thing that mattered was that it saved the publishing industry billions of dollars over course of a few decades.
Before cameras were invented, painting was used not as a creative art, but as a photographic tool. After the invention of the camera, artists became extinct, because only an idiot would paint when a camera could do the job much better. The only exception is with conceptual artists, which actually required some imagination. But many fakes have infiltrated the genre, and used it to achieve fame and riches. They were in the right place at the right time, did the right schmoozing and the right backstabbing. And are now households names. The billions being made on their "work" after their deaths is used to perpetuate a PR campaign aimed at convincing the masses that no talent bums such as Picasso were really artists.
With all scandals and conspiracies, follow the money. In art’s case, the money leads straight into the toilet. Paintings of nude people are not fine art, they’re smut. It’s a disgraceful display of decadence and deprivation, based on filth and ignorance, yet masquerading as art. The names of the artists shall not be mentioned here because they should be banished into obscurity forever and their works be burned. Their biographies should be stricken from the history books except in reference to them as perverts and sex fiends. Their graves should be exhumed and caskets transferred to a remote dumpsite where rats and buzzards can gnaw on their sarcophagi. Meanwhile we can rest assured that if there is a hell, they are burning away there. This is a mild criticism, much less than they deserve.
Many of "great masters" were nothing more than dope heads and booze hounds, who sold their soles to their agents in return for another drink or fix respectively. Notorious nuts like Van Gough and Pollack were prime examples what artists in society have become. Their best work was done when they were shit-faced drunk. Aspiring artists and art school graduates emulate this bohemian tradition because it’s the only way they can be creative, because they have no real talent. People think artists are good because someone told them they were good. If one judges independently however, one sees that these artists are actually no good. The good thing is, now you know the truth.
The same is true about cinema, but painting is on trial here so I’ll stick to painting. The problem with this nudity in art is that it replaces real nudity. Guys figure it’s cheaper and easier to look at a painting than it is to get a woman to strip. Secret surveillance has revealed that many sick degenerates even masturbate while viewing nude images. Undercover stakeout teams have observed this deviant behavior in many sectors of society. Some of you reading this right now have probably been videotaped doing it, but these tapes will only be used for research purposes and no criminal charges will be filed, although they should be. They should prosecute you to the fullest extent of the law, lock you up and throw away the key. And perhaps you should be executed, but that’s not for me to decide. A judge should decide that you be put to death, and a jury should decide that you be tortured first. How else will you learn? Painters throughout history have toiled away their lives on this senseless activity. And the utter absurdity can be seen in the millions people pay for a painted strip of canvas stretched across a wooden frame. Its an industry of idiots which extends its idiocy into society affecting the citizenry in negative ways, contributing to their ultimate demise.
The reason why people succumb to such weakness is because they are trained from birth to think that art is OK. This blind acceptance has led mankind down a counter-evolutionary path where it is condemned to ignorance for all eternity unless we wake up to the facts about painting as an art form. Muckraker exists to alert and warn readers about the real reality behind social norms and cultural conditioning. We seek out truth no matter how insane it may seem at first. The liars disguise truth as insanity to divert attention away from the scandalous conspiracies they’re involved in. Some people have accused Muckraker of being overly critical about art, but we are always right in the end because truth and justice is on our side. In this case, painters are the problem du jour of society. They insult our intelligence while even more ignorant agents pedal their garbage in galleries for obscene amounts of money. This horrible conspiracy must be stopped if we are to survive as a sane society. At this point however it appears as though we are doomed thanks to the ongoing stranglehold the art establishment has us in.
Another major issue is that the whenever marketing agents need a new revenue stream they search for people who are trying to learn how to paint and collect the failed attempts from their trash cans. The pieces discarded by the inept painters look like trash but the agents market them as the latest style of modern art, the current trend in the visual medium masterfully painted by a fresh new artistic genius. This marketing strategy that involved garbage labeled as cutting-edge artwork was exemplified by Vincent Van Gogh who cut off his ear to prove just how cutting-edge he really was. It was a great publicity stunt that assured his place in art history books—and money in the agent's bank account.
The word literature comes from the root word 'shiterature'. And true to form, most literature lives up to its name. Hitler sounds like literature so it could all be a secret nazi code designed to brainwash readers. This would explain the rampant indoctrination of scholars with draconian philosophies. When they read they don't realize that its really a trick to rob them of their time, just like TV. What is reading but looking at millions of gallons of ink printed on a page or displayed on a screen? It matters not what the meaning is because its probably a lie.
The clearest example of how literature is wrong and bad can be found within literature itself. After all, words are literature. Words like shit and scum are clear proof of the nature of this art form. These words illustrate the very negative way literature effects us. Every disease has a name, so it must be the name that is the disease. Words come from thoughts, so we can only control the thoughts through brainwashing or implants, both of which are not fool proof. Until then thoughts manifested as words will continue to pervert language.
Reading and writing are ways to block mental development because we get dependent on a crude form of communication. It's a way to thwart human potential and cause premature blindness. The elite class does not read. If you see them reading, it's only an act to fake you out. Smart people don't need to read. People who waste time reading are hurting themselves and society at large, because their stupidity is contagious, causing accidents and public health hazards. Writers are to blame. They are the drug dealers of literature and readers are the drug addicts. Its all a big issue of ignorance in society. The question is what to do about it. We can't chop off hands and cut out tongues. But we can bind and gag. It is a safe and effective way to force telepathic communication. It will take generations to accomplish it but our descendants will thank us for it. By then humans will only be able to utter mumbling phrases, sounding like idiots but we already sound like idiots anyway so what do we have to lose?
Fiction is lies, pure and simple. Fiction is the work of flickered authors and compulsive liars. The fact that these lies are revered as great literary works speaks volumes about the sad state of society. This situation has been going on for quite some time. The age old classics show how little civilization has progressed in the last 20 centuries. It's as if there is a conspiracy to keep humanity in the dark ages. Today ignorance prevails as the same tales are told over and over again. New books of fiction are simply new twists on old lies, or new lies altogether. Readers don't question the merits of such "work" because they have been conditioned over the centuries that it is just entertainment. But literary fiction, like some cinematography, is a mental prison from which there is no escape. When one reads fiction, one pretends that it's the truth, and in so doing, it really becomes the truth for them. And they act on that belief. In fact much of what people do in society is based on the fiction (lies) they read. But who publishes these lies, and for what reason? To find the answer to that question, one need not look any further than to those who gain from public ignorance, the people in control. Because this is how they control; by keeping the populace in a state of ignorance, and feeding them a diet of lies.
Smart readers however can read between the lines to decipher the truth. Sometimes the only truth is that there is no truth to be found. But that is an important first step to learning where not to look for truth. Any thinking person knows that this. The problem is that there are very few thinking persons. Why? Because they don't want to think. They've been bred like clones into accepting unconditionally the lies they read on a daily basis. They find comfort in the ease of not having to work their brains to see through the muck in their minds. It takes great effort to untangle the confusion and figure out the truth. It's easier to play dumb and go along lock-step with the masses in a headlong rush into a deeper darker state of ignorance.
Non-fiction is fiction with the prefix 'non' added to it to give it the appearance of not being lies. But its a trick to make readers think that there is some literature that is actually true. The fact that someone thinks they have a monopoly on the truth shows how arrogant and conceited authors and publishers are. In reality they are evil to the core, as evidenced by the proliferation of pornography and newspapers on the streets. Not much else can be written on this subject because non-fiction is a non-issue.
So all writing must be assumed to be fiction because how can we know if its really true? The only exception is the writings of Muckraker, which are pure. There are some who may disagree, but they themselves are not pure, so their disagreement matters not. What matters is the insight these writings give, which can't be found anywhere else. This proves that the vast majority of literature is simply propaganda, and that only Muckraker can be believed.
Nothing intelligent can be written about poetry because its the bastard of human language. When combined with music the mixture makes a lethal weapon against social stability and due order. All poets should be held responsible for linguistic rape. The fact that poetry is popular shows that rape is popular, and it logically follows that some people who love poetry also love rape. This is the hard reality we must face in society today. It cannot nor should not be ignored. Because those who ignore things are ignorant.
Disturbed individuals such as Edgar Allen Poe are typical poets whos ranting and ravings inspired many a serial killer. Every perverted ax murderer on the planet was and is a Poe fan. Hence everyone with a Poe Book should be sentenced to death row, before they have a chance to kill again. Poe and others of his ilk inspired their contemporary horror writers to reach even grosser levels of evil, unleashing hellish thoughts that live as sure as reality is. It is through writing that this damage is being done to society. No good can come from writing, anyone who has ever seen pornography knows that it's the pictures that are important.
Poetry led to Rap "music". And rap sounds like crap
Screenplays and Scripts
Even if all books were burned, literature would survive through the cinema. So all cameras and televisions should be destroyed, lest we fall further into folly. Screenplays were invented for people who can't read. Now they can watch the lies in living color. Brainwashers get better results when the victim is at an early age before they can read, and are more receptive to the suggestions seen on the screen. That's why scripts written for children's programming are replete with subliminal messages designed to thwart mental growth. Educators and entertainment providers lower themselves to the level of the child, instead of elevating the child's consciousness to a proper level. The overall effect is a staggering reversal of the evolutionary process. And that, in turn, is why so many young men look like the three stooges.
Screenplays are rapidly replacing the novel as the main story telling art. There is an art to screen writing. It is a lost art as anyone who watches movies can attest. It is a well-known fact that more money is made on refreshments and popcorn at the cinema than on ticket sales. Consuming a movie, which originated as a screenplay is like consuming junk food at the concession stand. The difference is that consumers are willing to pay more for the junk food. They know that it is a better value. Screenplays have no literary value except as a set of directions to tell no-talent actors how to act. Most movies have a screenplay because most actors can't act. They need to be told what and how to do everything. Screenplays are a crutch for this mentally handicap. Though many actors have mental handicaps, they need a script when playing a simpleton. Some stories are adapted from a real book. Much the same way garbage is recycled. First the author must read the book, then the story is regurgitated like vomit from his mind, in the format of a screenplay. Careful attention is given to ensure that the original story is completely lost. This is true for cinema as well as drama. The fact that there are so many homosexuals in the theatre means that screenplays cause homosexuality. Recent studies affirm this belief.
Scripts are useless without actors and a director, and vise versa.
The origin of music can be traced to cavemen bashing in the heads of other cavemen in a rhythmic beat syncopation. This is why rap and hip-hop are so popular in some sectors of society. The sound brings out the primate beast of their ancestral roots from within connected genetically. Modern corporations have found ways to exploit this handicap. They studied the habits of the baboon to understand the type of person that is attracted to beat music. Later in the history of music, homosexual tendencies began to surface when composers such as Mozart and Bach paraded around in wigs and sissy outfits. About this time, wind instruments grew in popularity. This became known as the romantic period. Groups of these deviant musicians joined together in group orgies. This is where the term orchestra comes from.
The decadent nature of this music is the cause of it’s demise. But the decadence factor reared it’s ugly head again when swing music came into being. This occurred during the prohibition when the worst criminals in society drank liquor and danced at speak-eases. This culminated in the genres of blues, rock and other deviant perversions masquerading as music styles. One of the many problems with music, and the reason it should be banned is that it poses a dangerous threat to the health and well-being of people in society. It has always been this way, starting with classical composers with their batons. It is not safe to wave a sharply pointed stick around in a roomful of people. In fact it is downright stupid. This may be a clue to the intrinsically violent nature of music.
It was none other than Hitler who said "To understand Nazi Germany one must understand Wagner. But music is addicting too. This is why people like it and can’t give it up. We should declare a War On Music. But in order to get kids to just say no, we must first educate them as to the dangers of this insidious menace. I say roll out role models such as Curt Cocaine, I mean Cobain, Janis Joplin and Jimi Hendrix as direct evidence of the death music causes. Eric Clapton’s hit song Cocaine promoting the drug, only served to reinforce the negative attributes of music as a silent killer. It’s addictive quality is hidden from public much the way tobacco was for decades, while companies raked in the profits leaving millions dead in the wake.
The musical holocaust is causing even greater casualties and should be stopped immediately or taxed out of existence. File sharing thieves on the internet spread the epidemic even further, and no one is able to stem the tide of online crime. Heroic efforts by Muckraker investigative journalists have exposed the music menace as a major risk. It has been the downfall of many societies. Remember Cicero played his violin while Rome burned. Music and it’s byproduct of social decay, will lead to the decline of civilization as we know it. The internet has driven many musicians out of business, and rightfully so, because most musicians should not be sending sound waves reverberating out into the universe and into others’ ears. It’s the same as spitting into others’ ears. Their music is like flegm infested saliva entering into the ears of every human being who listens. And it is impossible to escape the effects of music because the sound waves bounce off of everything else. Even if you’re far away, it still effects you on a subliminal level. The only solution is to ban music altogether. Society would be better off. Music is like a gun.
There are groups for and against the proliferation of music. Society has become so saturated with music that music has lost all meaning and has become one big ominous drone. This is precisely why music must be stopped before it’s too late and we all become a race of imbeciles who can’t distinguish art from noise. With each new generation humanity is evolving into a dim-witted class of subspecies conditioned by the media to obey commands dictated through subliminal codes. This is why criminals are driven to acts of violence subsequent to performing murders, rapes and a host of other evil deeds caused by music. Without music there would be peace on earth. Music as sound deprives one of the necessary amount of rest one needs in order to maintain one’s sanity. We all know how irritating a neighbor’s loud stereo can be. Music sufferers have been known to go ballistic when the constant noise gets to be too much for the to bare. Laws should be enacted to protect us all from these musical attacks, because music is a form of torture. People don’t always recognize it as such because we have been tortured for so long that we except it as normal.
The problem of music in society is massive. Only The Muckraker cares enough to stand up and protest against this issue. Everyone knows that musicians and record company employees are all drug addicts, who seduce consumers into buying their deadly products. They hire sexy women in mini-skirts to go-go dance in nightclubs, because the music alone is not good enough to satisfy as an entertainment medium. Another problem is that listeners who hear music take on the characteristics of those making the music. So when one hears some junkie punk screaming profanities to the thrashing noise of over-amplified instruments, one actually becomes that punk through the effects of resonance. That means the vibrations from the source transfer over to the end user causing them to take on the traits of the primary causal effect. This is why fans grow hair, dress and act like their idols. And this is why we have a drug problem in society, and this is proof that music is bad.
Drama is the art of lying. Actors make the best liars, and not all actors are in show business, but show business is on trial here so we wont explain how lying in general is widespread and rampant everywhere, especially in "sacred places". Drama is lying taken to the extreme. No other sin is taken to an art form, though some have tried. The art of drama is more than just artistic lying, its even taken to the level of a religion, in that there are icons (stars), and followers, and the rituals (plays) are conducted in huge temples (theatres).
Theatres are bastions of evil. President Lincoln was assassinated in one by John Wilkes Booth which psychological profilers believe had an inferiority complex because booths are so much smaller than theatres. It's no coincidence that Superman disrobed in a phone booth, symbolizing a closet, where so many homosexuals in the theatre reside. Booth the assassin, ass for short, represents the anus, or booth (closet) into which withdraws the uncontrollable darker urges, in the form of a male image. This phallic gender symbol penetrating the closet cavity is indicative (no pun intended) of the deep seated fixation drama professionals have.
When you see a gut wrenching performance in a Hollywood tear-jerker, remember that it's all a lie. Behind the scenes there are hundreds of production people with one purpose: to fake you out, to trick you, to take your money, to manipulate your emotions, to influence your behavior, and do many other harmful things to you. They are mealy mouthed maggots who feed on you the same as worms feeding on meat. You are the meat. Drama is the butcher. The creators of drama are to blame for widespread disease of thought and spirit. Dramatic works that are said to stink, actually do because the stench of rotten carcass, ass for short (there's that word again), which is the consumer being consumed.
Most drama comes from literature, which explains why it should be banned, censored or eradicated as soon as possible. Those who oppose this measure should be examined closely to determine how extensive their brainwashing is, and to prescribe an effective recovery regimen. If no use can be found for them in society, then they should be sent to a sanitarium for the clinically insane, where they can receive shock therapy wearing a straight jacket in a padded cell, while being constantly tormented by a tyrannical orderly. If they ain't nuts before they go in, they sure will be when they get out, if they get out.
As the origin of the modern musical play this performance art genre is a mongrel crossbreed of two distinct forms of art, music and drama. Created by musicians who wanted to be actors, and actors who wanted to be musicians; and it's a textbook example of the consequential defects of inbreeding—even if it's between two art forms. Although it is exactly like a theatre the venue where operas are performed is called an opera “house”, because it's more like a whorehouse than a theatre. Opera is like the deformed offspring of a whore (drama) and a drunken sailor (music). Although both of these arts share equal blame for the snafu neither claim financial responsibility for the pathetic cripple. So the illegitimate bastard must rely on handouts from aristocracy to support the costly care required to keep it alive. Aristocrats are sympathetic to the inbred because they too are often inbred—and they too are the only people who can afford to buy an opera ticket.
The average person who listens objectively would hate it. But those who understand the innate satirical comedy—whether or not it's intended—love the opera. Fans don't care about the music or the drama; they are intrigued by the curious combination of the two genres bound in a surreal schizophrenic spectacle on a grand scale. They observe the bizarre behavior of the cast performing in a fine art freak show that only a certain class of eccentric patrons can fully appreciate. The theatre stage set looks normal and the orchestra sounds normal but the singers sound anything but normal. The singing would be unbearable to listen to it wasn't so strangely interesting. In a vain attempt to make the performance entertaining the vocalists sound off with an overly exaggerated display of melodramatic mouth muscle that irks the audience for hours. But it's not over until the fat lady sings, so it will be a long wait—seeing that most opera divas are obese.¨
Splicing together the genetic aesthetics of music, drama, and dance, Ballet is another art-form inbreeding experiment gone horribly awry. It's an illicit 3-way ménage à trios procreated by madmen who should have been stopped before they ever started; and now the popularity of this metastasized mutant hybrid has become a pesky problem of society. Compounding the calamity are the challenges presented in grappling for a solution to the issue because any attempt to study it leads to severe migraine headaches and nausea. Nonetheless, we must commit ourselves with steadfast determination to the task of undertaking a swift and decisive eradication effort, lest we become a society of sissies—like in France.
The intrinsic defects from its conception make Ballet impossible to appreciate unless we gouge our eyes out and cement our ears shut. But even then it will still affect us just knowing that it exists beyond the faculties of our five senses. Try as we may, we can never escape our intuitive awareness of a Ballet performance if one is ever happening somewhere in the world. In an ongoing effort to ascertain the eerie attributes that make this amalgamated art so abhorrent let us consider some of the elements involved. The music sounds good enough and the ballerinas—though frail and emaciated—look sexy enough as they spring their knees, spin their hips and do their splits—like in the Nutcracker but without the nuts. Then just when you start to think that maybe you like the ballet, here comes the sugar plum fairy ballerino, the male ballet dancer in full regalia—leotards, make-up, and all. He ruins the show for everybody. The girls hate him because he tries to wants to use their dressing room; the straight guys hate him because they're homophobic; and the gay guys hate him because he make a mockery out of their sexual orientation, gallivanting around in a pathetic parody of a prima donna pussy. He looks every bit like a flaming faggot—whether or not he actually is one.
There is evidence that ballet is a surrogate sport and the dancers play athletic games vicariously through ballet. It's a fascinating psychosocial phenomenon that bears insight to the underlying operations that manifest such outcomes. To fully comprehend the nexus of factors conducive to the particular circumstance involved an exhaustive analysis is in order. There are a significant number of similarities between sports and ballet starting with the name. In regard the sport concept, the term Ballet is derived from two root words, “ball” and “let”, as in “let's play ball”—which expresses the unspoken athletic urge burning inside every ballerina. The powerful force created by the predominance of females with this unrealized yet overarching passion to fulfill their zeal to play sports is multiplied exponentially, resulting in the apparent verisimilitude of ballet being a sport. Of all the forms of art ballet is by far the most athletic, in fact most athletes could not execute most of the choreographic stunts routinely practiced by the dancers. Some sports uniforms have similarities with the skintight leggings worn by ballerinas. Male athletes stubbornly refuse to disclose details concerning their undergarments, which only fuels speculation that it's the same as those worn by ballet dancers. There will come a day when discriminatory injustice will end and all of the pro sports athletes no longer need to hide their sexual orientation in the closet, or locker room.
Dancing, otherwise known as choreography is another perverted art firm. It's most often used by aggressive sexists to get their hands on a woman's body. Muckraker infiltrated dance houses, discos and raves to observe the dance culture. What we found was that dancers are frustrated sex maniacs. They can't just jump in bed and fornicate. They must do this bizarre ritual known as dancing. It's a primal force holding back evolutionary progress, not just for them, but for all mankind. The rest of us should not be subject to the wild impulses that drive young dancers to the clubs to shake their ass. Afterwards they are too tired for sex, so our species won't procreate and will become extinct. This all caused by dancing.
Whirling dervishes are typical of the common dancer. They spin around in circles getting dizzy as an idiot, and think they see god. The feeling of exultation is simply lack of oxygen in the brain caused by the spinning. Yet the state of idiocy is equated with enlightenment. Same is true for all religion, but that's another story. Other dancers include the Watusi tribe in Africa, known for their lanky height and primal screams. They have chants that cause a trance which rhymes with dance. There is even a genre called trance, which is a very simple sound. Simple as in simpleton. The sound actually causes stupidity, which is why so many dancers like it. It's in the way the acoustic waves blend with the brainwaves. Most dance music causes mental retardation. Victims are ashamed to admit it, so Muckraker has a responsibility to society at large to expose this problem for all to recognize and unite in a common effort to suppress the growing dance movement.
The drug Extract is a permanent fixture at the local dance club. Teens get addicted, overdose and die because of the dance scene. Dancers dance because they want to be an artist or musician, but they don't have talent and can't play an instrument, so they jump around and move their bodies. Anyone can do that. So dancing as an art is a farce. It's more like pornography which some will argue is a better art. Dancing is allot like drugs. The two are closely entangled. Dancing while on drugs creates a dual addiction where one needs the other to be complete. Dancing is worse than drugs because it is done directly by the perpetrator, whereas drugs are innocent bystanders abused by the perpetrator. So there should be a war on dancing. An all-out assault on drug dealers in dance houses addicting youngsters to extract.
Fred Astaire couldn't get a girl until he danced. That's the only reason he danced. It was the only way any woman would have anything to do with him. Hollywood types have access to large quantities of drugs and lots of time to party in orgies where dancing is rampant. It is places such as this that continue to spread the AIDS epidemic. Youngsters should just say no to dancing.
Architecture is another systemic problem of society which has its roots in early antiquity when man first built shelters out of cow shit and mud, known as adobe. This was our first mistake. The love affair with scat culminated in present day structures that come equipped with rooms called lavatories, or restrooms. These rooms have things devoted exclusively to the love and care of human waste, otherwise known as piss and shit. These apparatuses are called toilets and urinals. They are the most obvious examples of architectural engineering gone awry. It is proof of scatological fixations by modern architects which evolved from the adobe period. With this new knowledge about architects, civilized people must now decide how to phase out the scat factor. Those who resist will be labeled anal retentive, and part of the conspiracy to keep mankind immersed in fecal waste, spreading death and disease as part of a larger genocidal movement for population control.
So the subject of architecture is a dirty one, in which filthy minds make buildings that have lavatories, which are a kind of laboratory. Toilets and urinals therein are like giant petri dishes breeding all kinds of deadly diseases, thanks to plumbers and construction workers in the building industry. This is an open admission of what goes on behind those doors: Scatological experimentation. This sad situation must be changed. Why let a handful of sick professionals control the quality of living of an entire civilization? Architects have let us down with their antics, so that entire industry should be dismantled before further harm can be done. Some say this is like throwing the baby out with the bath water, but bathtubs are OK, its the toilets and urinals were against. Architects are taking human potential and flushing it down the drain in an orgy of waste and scum, which is their domain.
There are dastardly elements at work in the field of architecture because it is not really an art anymore, its a science. The nerds hijacked the art and turned it into an engineering process. And all art is being systematically replaced with anti-creative activities. But architecture has been changed from what was once a noble craft, into what is now a mockery to mankind. Buildings are designed to collapse during earthquakes and burn during fires as they often do. They can easily be built to protect against earthquakes and fires, but they are not. Many innocent children die each year in structures designed by architects. These death houses are specifically designed to kill people who occupy them.
Its no coincidence that the word 'shelter' completes the 3rd part of 'helter skelter'.
The World Trade Center was designed to collapse when struck by passenger jets. And as a result thats exactly what happened. Thousands died in the towering infernos built by architerrorists. In fact all architects are terrorists in a way because terrorists use architecture to terrorize their victims. Prisons are legal houses of horror for those inside. Architects take particular pleasure in creating these structures. Torture chambers and death rows are both excellent examples of architecture gone awry. They love to design buildings where people suffer and endure great pain such as hospitals and dental clinics. These structures should be demolished or converted to places of worship. Architects are also responsible for creating tombs and other structures devoted to death and morbidity.
Crack houses and whore houses are what modern architecture has become. They are the crowning hallmark of the profession. Funeral homes and comedy clubs are other examples of malicious architecture. Everything bad in society comes from architecture, and by extension, urbanization. Because the other extreme is the natural environment, which everyone agrees is healthier. Its better to live in a cave than to submit to the twisted perversion of an architect.
This is another example of art gone awry. Granted there are some aesthetic issues involved with the clothes we wear, but that's no excuse to do what all too many so-called fashion designers do. Clothing is not art per se, it's for protection from the elements, and for covering the unsightly bodies of ugly people—and it's legally required in most municipalities. Since clothing is compulsory it should look discreet yet tasteful, not ostentatious. Fashion designers have built an entire industry around pretentious, conspicuous, flamboyant, and gaudy apparel. They equate their art with brash extravagance and glitzy kitsch. Not much thought goes into their designs because they change the styles every few months to ensure a steady revenue stream. For fashion fanatics if you are not wearing the latest style you're a pathetic loser. And the more expensive the outfit is the more status it symbolizes—no matter how tacky it looks. It's all about money with these people so artistic refinement expressly forbidden.
Fashion wear is mostly a female interest because men often rip their clothes to shreds in bar fights and sex crimes, while women adorn their bodies with fine fabrics to up their worth as a marketable commodity. That's why lingerie is so popular among chicks. Statistics show that men are inclined to pay much more when facing a woman in underwear with her hand out. Regardless of the sex appeal issue the fashion industry is a bastion of homosexuality, full of gay designers and models. The preponderance of gays is due to wide spread discrimination in other industries in the past when they were forced into the underground sweatshops as pseudo seamstresses and underwear models. They toiled night and day to earn equal employment opportunities in the burgeoning industry and were eventually successful in completely domineering all sectors of it. Their influence is evident in many of the weird wardrobes worn by even weirder looking models. You can the tell gay designer's model by their slender emaciated bodies and the livid facial expressions, not exactly the curvaceous sex pots that guys prefer.
The style of clothing worn by late teen and young adult males is indicative of what is wrong with the perverted art of fashion design and with society at large. This group wears clothes that are always XXL—way too big for their scrawny physiques—and makes them look even more malnourished than they already are. The baggy trousers hang down below ass level—not that anyone wants to see. But they stare anyway because it looks so stupid, just like the untied shoes, and the hat worn sideways. It's a waste of good fabric that could be better used to clothe the naked masses in sub-Saharan hellholes that have no Armani boutiques. If wearing this preposterous style is meant to be a fashion statement, it must be saying, “Hey, I'm a fashion fool with nothing to lose, except myself inside this circus tent I'm wearing ”. The good thing about this outfit is that just like the 1970s platform shoes, it makes it hard to run from the police.
The one good thing about fashion design is that young women are demanding sexy styles and the designers are supplying them sexy styles of clothing. Or maybe the designers are demanding the retail prices and women are supplying the payment. Either way, the influx of sexually explicit apparel will increase mop and bucket sales to cope with the deluge from salivating men.
The camera eliminated the need for artists to slave for weeks over a hot drawing board to create an accurate visual representation of a subject. Moreover, the camera exposed the utter incompetence of humans when it comes to reproducing a realistic image no matter how long they try. The fact that humans invented the camera just adds insult to injury, On top of that, painters can't even claim that they can make a subject look like an artistic painting better than a camera can, because a photographer can achieve that look faster using photo editing software. So all the work by all the painters throughout history was a complete waste of time. They should have just waited for the camera to be invented, because instead of being hailed as great masterpieces their work now stands as a titanic testimonial to their vast ignorance. If they only knew how they much would be mocked and ridiculed by us today they surely would have chosen an alternative vocation. But they did not so it is our duty to desecrate their work and use them as an example of all that is wrong with the genre of painting classified as realism.
On the other hand, those who are just too lazy to use paint and a brush use cameras. Instead of developing their artistic talent they let their brains deteriorate by pointing a camera and clicking a button. Their lives are reduced to a series of simple snapshots without substance and without meaning. But in their wishful thinking about being an artist they attach all kinds of pseudo significance to the pictures. Meanwhile the rapid proliferation of cameras in society and the associated waste byproducts has generated a toxic nightmare that will eventually develop into a carcinogenic cataclysm and hasten our extinction—all because of the photographers. They already did enough environmental damage when film was the used prior to digital cameras. Photo processing centers polluted rivers and streams with millions of gallons of hazardous waste, causing extensive contamination to the ecosystem and irreparable harm to the flora, fauna, and wildlife on the entire planet.